annoying.com
annoying.com is a live website, registered in 1996, served from Ashburn, United States. It has a valid HTTPS certificate, 0 of 6 common security headers.
Does annoying.com publish the usual trust pages?
None of about, contact, privacy or terms could be found at their usual addresses. That is common for small or single-purpose sites, and it is also what a disposable site looks like, so it is worth noting rather than concluding from. These were checked at conventional paths only, so a site using different URLs may publish them elsewhere.
How does annoying.com compare with other domains analysed here?
Measured against the 79 domains in this index. This is a small, self-selected sample — the domains people happened to look up — not a representative sample of the web.
| Response time | Faster than 66% of them (median 657ms) |
|---|---|
| Security headers | More than 0% of them |
| Domain age | Older than 96% of them |
Related domains in this index
Other analysed domains served from the same country:
- donorstech.com
- napbuzz.com
- coatnews.com
- kextra.com
- newsgiga.com
- storkworld.com
- techgriper.com
- techquiller.com
When was annoying.com registered?
annoying.com was registered on 20 September 1996, which makes it about 30 years old.
A registration this old means the domain has been renewed repeatedly, which costs money every year and is not something abandoned or disposable projects tend to do.
The registrar of record is NameCheap, Inc..
Registration runs until 16 June 2027.
The domain carries 1 registry lock, which blocks unauthorised transfer or deletion.
| Registered | 20 September 1996 |
|---|---|
| Expires | 16 June 2027 |
| Registrar | NameCheap, Inc. |
| Registry status | client transfer prohibited |
Where is annoying.com hosted?
The first address resolves to infrastructure in Ashburn, United States.
The network is operated by Oracle Corporation (AS31898 Oracle Corporation).
Hosting location describes where the responding server sits, not where the business is. A CDN will report its nearest edge rather than the origin.
What is annoying.com running on?
No platform, framework or analytics fingerprints were found in the homepage markup of annoying.com. That usually means hand-written HTML, an uncommon stack, or a page assembled entirely at the edge.
No recognisable platform, framework or analytics fingerprints were found in the homepage markup.
How does the homepage respond?
The server answered with HTTP 200 over HTTPS.
At 448ms to first byte this response is unremarkable for a homepage measured from a single European location.
The HTML is compressed with gzip.
| Server header | Apache |
|---|---|
| Compression | gzip |
| Page size | 254 bytes |
| Declared language | not declared |
| Mobile viewport | not declared |
What does the homepage say about itself?
The title is only 19 characters, which is short enough that it probably is not describing the page so much as naming it.
There is no meta description, so the snippet shown in search results is assembled by the search engine from whatever text it considers relevant.
No H1 heading was found, so the page offers no single top-level statement of what it is.
All 1 images on the homepage have alt attributes.
No viewport meta tag is declared, so mobile browsers will render the page at desktop width and scale it down.
The html element declares no lang attribute, which removes a signal both screen readers and translation tools rely on.
| Title | A burning sensation (19 chars) |
|---|---|
| Meta description | — none — (0 chars) |
| H1 | — none — (0 on the page) |
| Canonical | not set |
| Open Graph title | not set |
| Headings / images | 0 H2s, 1 images (0 without alt text) |
Is annoying.com served over a valid certificate?
The HTTPS certificate is issued by Let's Encrypt and is valid until 2026-11-08, which is 34 days from the date of this check. It covers 2 hostnames.
- *.annoying.com
- annoying.com
The certificate has 34 days left to run.
It covers 2 hostnames, so it was issued for this site specifically.
Let's Encrypt certificates are free and run on 90-day terms, so this site is almost certainly renewing automatically.
Which security headers does it set?
None of the 6 headers checked are set. That is the default state of most servers rather than evidence of a problem, but it means the browser is given no instructions it could otherwise act on.
Without HSTS, a browser that has never visited before will try HTTP first, which is the window a network attacker needs.
With no Content Security Policy, any script that reaches the page — including one injected through a compromised third-party dependency — runs with full access to it.
| Header | Set | Value |
|---|---|---|
| HSTS | no | — |
| Content Security Policy | no | — |
| X-Content-Type-Options | no | — |
| X-Frame-Options | no | — |
| Referrer-Policy | no | — |
| Permissions-Policy | no | — |
How is DNS configured for annoying.com?
| IP addresses | 192.185.173.159 |
|---|---|
| Reverse DNS | 192-185-173-159.unifiedlayer.com |
| Name servers | ns1056.websitewelcome.com, ns1055.websitewelcome.com |
| Mail (MX) | mail.annoying.com (pri 0) |
| SPF | v=spf1 a mx include:websitewelcome.com ~all |
| TXT records | 1 |
annoying.com resolves to a single address, so there is no DNS-level redundancy.
Mail is handled by 1 exchanger.
An SPF record is published, giving receiving servers a rule for which hosts may send as this domain.
Reverse DNS resolves to 192-185-173-159.unifiedlayer.com, which usually names the hosting provider.
Who runs DNS and mail for annoying.com?
Mail exchangers point at hosts that do not match any major provider, which usually means self-hosted or niche-provider mail.
No AAAA records are published, so the site is reachable over IPv4 only.
Can annoying.com be spoofed in email?
No DMARC record is published, so there is no instruction telling receiving servers what to do with mail that fails authentication. In practice that means forged mail from this domain is likely to be delivered.
No CAA records are published, so any certificate authority may issue a certificate for this domain.
The zone is not DNSSEC-signed. That is still the norm for most domains, but it means DNS answers cannot be cryptographically verified.
What does robots.txt allow?
No robots.txt was served. Crawlers treat a missing file as permission to crawl everything, so this is an open crawl policy by default rather than a blocked one.
What structured data does the homepage publish?
No JSON-LD or microdata was found on the homepage.
What does annoying.com load from third parties?
The homepage loads no resources from third-party hosts at all, which is rare and means visiting it tells no other company that you did.
No cookies are set on first load.
Does annoying.com settle on one address?
Plain HTTP serves the site directly instead of redirecting to HTTPS. That leaves an unencrypted copy reachable and gives search engines two addresses for the same content.
Both annoying.com and www.annoying.com answer with 200 and neither redirects to the other. Search engines therefore see two complete copies of the site, and link equity is split between them unless a canonical tag resolves it.
How easily can annoying.com be crawled?
No readable sitemap was found, so crawlers have to discover every page by following links.
A deliberately invalid URL correctly returns HTTP 404, so missing pages will not be indexed.
What tracking does annoying.com run?
No analytics or advertising trackers were detected on the homepage of annoying.com, which is unusual for a commercial site.
How does annoying.com look when shared?
No Open Graph or Twitter Card tags are present. Links shared to social platforms will fall back to whatever the platform can scrape, usually just a bare URL.
How are images, fonts and scripts handled?
1 image on the homepage, 0 of them lazy-loaded (0%).
All image references use JPEG, PNG or GIF. WebP or AVIF typically cut image weight substantially at the same visual quality.
No srcset attributes are used, so every device is served the same image size regardless of screen.
The page pulls 0 external stylesheets and 0 external scripts, with 0 carrying defer or async.
Is annoying.com accessible and current?
The page uses 0 landmark elements and 0 ARIA attributes.
No skip-to-content link was found, which keyboard users rely on to bypass navigation.
2 deprecated HTML elements are still in use (center, font, marquee or blink).
The page does not open with the HTML5 doctype, which can put browsers into quirks mode.
Can search engines index annoying.com?
Nothing on the homepage prevents indexing: no noindex is set in the robots meta tag or the X-Robots-Tag header.
No canonical URL is declared, which leaves duplicate addresses of this page to be resolved by the search engine.
Visible text makes up 7.5% of the HTML.
How is annoying.com delivered?
No Cache-Control header is sent for the HTML, so caching behaviour is left to browser defaults.
No favicon is declared in the markup.
Frequently asked questions
Does annoying.com set the usual HTTP security headers?
It sets 0 of 6. The ones not present are: HSTS, Content Security Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, X-Frame-Options, Referrer-Policy, Permissions-Policy.
Does annoying.com allow AI crawlers?
No robots.txt is served, so nothing is disallowed and AI crawlers are free to read the site.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure was measured by our own server on 4 October 2026: DNS lookups, one HTTPS request to the homepage, a TLS handshake and a request for robots.txt. No third-party SEO API is involved.
Is any of this traffic or authority data?
No. Traffic, authority and ranking figures cannot be measured by inspecting a domain, only modelled. Everything here is a direct observation.
I own annoying.com and want this page removed.
Email hello@quikconsolecom.net from an address at the domain and the report will be taken down. It only ever shows what the domain already serves publicly.
Analysed 4 October 2026. Analyse another domain →